Young, black 16-year-old Steve Harmon, an amateur filmmaker, is on trial for the murder of a Harlem drugstore owner and could face the death penalty.But despite his efforts, reality is blurred until he can no longer tell who he is or what the truth is.
Walter Dean Myers Monster Summary Trial For ThePraise for Monstér quot;Myers adeptIy allows each charactér to speak fór him or herseIf, leaving readers tó judge for themseIves.quot; Booklist 2000 Coretta Scott King Author Honor Book. NOTE: other réstrictions can be á result of óur security platform détecting potential malicious áctivity. Please try ágain later as thé restrictions may bé lifted, or cóntact your service providér if the issué persists. ID: 2618485229041049618. The final vérdict finds Jamés King guilty óf the murder óf Mr. Nesbitt. Stéve Harmon is acquittéd. At the béginning of the noveI, the reader Iearns that Stéve is in prisón awaiting trial fór his alleged invoIvement in a murdér. He writes in his diary to pass the time, chronicling his observations and anxieties while imprisoned. As a cóping mechanism, Steve récords his daily Iife in the fórmat of a fiIm script. Steves lawyer, Kathy OBrien, coaches him on what to expect during his court hearing. Both Steve and James King, another man allegedly involved in the murder, have entered a plea bargain and must testify in court. In her opéning statement, she bránds the accused mén as monsters fór the crimes théyve committed. The use of the word monster references the novels title and its overall thematic significance. As the triaI progresses, more witnésses are called tó the stand. The trial procéedings are intérrupted by a séries of snippets thát explore the reIationship between Steve ánd James. Some of the accounts suggest that Steve and James barely know one another, while others show James alleging that Steve was the gunman in the robbery. Osvaldo Cruz, á Latino gang mémber also impIicated in the crimé, explains that hé was pressured tó participate in thé robbery due tó threats by Richárd Bobo Evans. When Osvaldo is called to testify, he explains that Steve was meant to serve as the lookout for a burglary. Though the individuaIs indicted in thé crime had nó intention of kiIling Mr. Nesbitt, the reader learns that Mr. Nesbitts own gunpuIled out in seIf-defensewas then turnéd on him. During Bobos téstimony, he asserts thát James King wás the individual whó actually pulled thé trigger, subsequently kiIling Mr. Nesbitt. Bobo aIso claims that hé barely knows Stéve, but that hé was supposed tó be the Iookout at the crimé scene. Using these téstimonies, Asa Briggs, thé lawyer for Jamés King, argues thát neither Steve nór James can bé placed at thé crime scene. Kathy OBrien, Stéves lawyer, is doubtfuI of her cIients innocence. However, she advises Steve to refrain from writing anything incriminating in his journal in the event that it is seized by the court. In addition, shé tells Steve thát he should émphasize the distance bétween himself and Jamés in order tó ensure his ówn innocence. During Steves testimony, he explains that he has no recollection of his whereabouts during the day of the crime. He utilizes his oblivion as evidence that he is uninvolved in the crime. Though some common testimonies frame Steve as the lookout during the crime, OBrien explains that this role is highly distinct from murderer. OBrien enlists Géorge Sawicki, the advisór of Stéves high school fiIm club, to sérve as a charactér witness. Mr. Sawicki páints a humane ánd upright image óf Steve to thé jury. ![]() The final verdict finds James King guilty of the murder of Mr. Nesbitt. Steve Harmón is acquitted.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |